python310Packages.sanic: enable since GHSA-7p79-6x2v-5h88 is resolved

[oati]

Description of changes

This commit reverts bf149c4, since GHSA-7p79-6x2v-5h88 only applies to sanic <20.12.6

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[risicle]

But have you seen what 20.12.6 does to "fix" it? sanic-org/sanic#2400

[oati]

But have you seen what 20.12.6 does to "fix" it? sanic-org/sanic#2400

Oh, I never saw that :/

The reason I was looking into this was that spaCy depends on sanic, but nix fails to find sanic in 3.10. It looks like spaCy supports 3.10, so I'm wondering if this would still be worth it.

[risicle]

I guess it depends what it uses sanic for - probably worth a try though.

[oati]

@risicle Looking at that patch more closely,

You should either use a supported version of Python (v3.6 - v3.9) or upgrade Sanic to v21+.

nixpkgs is on sanic version 21.12.1

[oati]

@costrouc @AluisioASG

[ajs124]

superseded by c95ab3c