python3Packages.pillow: 9.0.0 -> 9.0.1

[mweinelt]

Motivation for this change

https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/releases/tag/9.0.1

Fixes:

• CVE-2022-22817: PIL.ImageMath.eval in Pillow before 9.0.0 allows evaluation of arbitrary expressions, such as ones that use the Python exec method.
  • Partial fix NixOS 21.11 (7f6df64), but needs to be updated to Restrict builtins within lambdas for ImageMath.eval python-pillow/Pillow#6009
• CVE-2022-24303: In show_file, use os.remove to remove temporary images.
  • No public CVE listing yet.

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[risicle]

Built python39Packages.pillow on macos 10.15

Tested on nixos against staging-next due to gfortran woes on staging. Built for python 3.9 & 3.10 there with pillow kivy tilequant mahotas pydicom pilkit cairosvg piexif pytesseract bokeh wordcloud faker pikepdf imageio python-mapnik imageio for python 3.10.

Wonder if we should do as in #157872 and add a couple of the more heavily used or sensitive of these to passthru.tests.

[jonringer]

Wonder if we should do as in #157872 and add a couple of the more heavily used or sensitive of these to passthru.tests.

Yea, that would be great.

But we can do that in another PR

[risicle]

I'll do the backport...