I often process complex and undocumented data such as game assets or web responses. Previously I used to add asserts everywhere to check things on the fly but now I think the much better practice is to split the job into two steps and preprocess the whole data, i.e. validate it, before starting the actual work with it, because:
- Having asserts in random places may cause running them more than once for no purpose.
- Having asserts at all is just slowing your program.
- It is much simpler to figure things out after you've processed all the data. Valid schema is a valid documentation.
The whole Nakischema API is just one method.
The whole schema is just one Ruby object.
Say no to needless DSLs.
Also exceptions are informative -- they tell you where and how things went wrong.
gem install nakischemarequire "nakischema"Schema can be as simple as just checking basic scalar objects for equality or class:
Nakischema.validate "John", String # => nil
Nakischema.validate "John", "Joe" # Nakischema::Error: expected "Joe" != "John"
Nakischema.validate "John", Numeric # Nakischema::Error: expected Numeric != StringAnd schema can be nested to validate nested objects.
Array and Hash objects have to be validated by Hash object schema with special keys:
:eachfor validating every Array item with nested schema object:hashfor validating every value via exact Hash keys match
Nakischema.validate( [
{name: "John", age: 20},
{name: "Bill", age: 15},
], {
each: {
hash: {
name: /\A[A-Z][a-z]+\z/,
age: 18..100,
},
},
} )expected 18..100 != 15 (at [:"#1", :age]) (Nakischema::Error)
:sizeto specify allowed Array size range:hash_reqto specify required Hash items:hash_optto specify optional Hash items -- subtracted when validating:hashif present
Your schema object can be recursive to validate objects that are recursive or just look like that:
human_schema = {}
human_schema.replace( {
hash_req: {name: /\A[A-Z][a-z]+\z/, age: 0..100},
hash_opt: {parents: {size: 2..2, each: human_schema}},
} )
father = {name: "John", age: 40}
mother = {name: "Anna", age: 40}
Nakischema.validate( [
father,
mother,
{name: "Bill", age: 18, parents: [father, mother]},
],
{each: human_schema}
)The [[ ]] syntax validates an Array in order (it also can be nested).
pets = [
["cat", "Thomas"],
]
Nakischema.validate( pets, {
each: [[/\A[a-z]+\z/, /\A[A-Z]/]]
} )The "or-group" [ ] tries to match the object with any of a given list of "rules" (schemas).
:assertionsallows passing a list of lambdas to do arbitrary checks and return booleans.
humans = [
{name: "John", gender: :male},
{name: "Anna", gender: :female, pets: %w{ Thomas }},
{name: "Bill", gender: :attack_helicopter},
]
Nakischema.validate( humans, {
each: {
hash_opt: {
pets: {
each: {
assertions: [
-> pet_id, _ { pets.map(&:last).include? pet_id },
],
}
},
},
hash_req: {
name: /\A[A-Z]/,
gender: [:male, :female],
},
},
} )expected at least one of 2 rules to match the :attack_helicopter, errors: (Nakischema::Error)
expected :male != :attack_helicopter (at [:"#2", :gender, :"variant#0"])
expected :female != :attack_helicopter (at [:"#2", :gender, :"variant#1"])
Here you can see that nested schema validation errors produce nested exception messages with indentation so you can easily see the whole validation object tree path that was made.
And if Anna had a pet with unfamiliar name that custom assertion would throw:
custom assertion failed (at [:"#1", :pets, :"#0"]) (Nakischema::Error)
Known issue and workaround: the [[[]]] is being interpereted as [[ [] ]], not [ [[]] ], but you can force it by doing: [:something, [[]]].
There are a few other special keys. You'll find them in source code easily.
gem oga is a Nokogiri analogue that I recommend you to try out because it's written in pure Ruby. Nakischema.validate_oga_xml is a method more or less similar to validate. See basic Wolfram Alpha API response validation as an example:
xml = Oga.parse_xml open link, &:read
Nakischema.validate_oga_xml xml, {
exact: {
"queryresult" => [[ {
attr_req: {"success": "true", "error": "false", "inputstring": query},
assertions: [
->n,_{ n.at_xpath("./pod")["id"] == "Input" },
->n,_{ n.xpath("/pod").each{ |_| _["id"] == _["title"].delete(" ") } },
],
exact: {"pod" => {size: 8..8}, "assumptions" => [[{}]]},
children: {
"/*[@error='true']" => [[]],
"/pod" => {each: {attr_req: {"id": /\A([A-Z][a-z]+)+(:([A-Z][a-z]+)+)?\z/, "scanner": /\A([A-Z][a-z]+)+\z/}}},
"./pod[@title='Input']" => [[{children: {"subpod" => [[{exact: {"plaintext" => [[{text: query}]]}}]]}}]],
"./pod[@primary='true']" => [[{children: {"subpod" => [[{exact: {"plaintext" => [[{}]]}}]]}}]],
"/pod[@scanner='Numeric']" => {each: {children: {"subpod" => [[{exact: {"plaintext" => [[{}]]}}]]}}},
},
} ]],
},
}exact-- similar tohashwhen usingvalidateattr_req-- required attributeschildren-- children nodestext-- ...text
exact and req accept either node name or XPath. Each results in an array of nodes of any length, even empty -- this is why you see so many [[]]. Also note that results of these selectors can overlap so you are able to apply multiple schemas to the same node.
Imagine you want to validate the args that were passed to Monitoring.log when calling the log_ruby_processes. First you write such test to see the actual args passed:
it :log_ruby_processes do
mock = MiniTest::Mock.new.expect :call, nil do |*args|
require "pp"
pp args
end
Monitoring.stub :log, mock do
log_ruby_processes
end
mock.verify
end$ ruby test.rb
...
[2021-09-06 00:59:58 UTC,
nil,
{:total=>3,
:each=>
[["/Users/nakilon/.../ruby test.rb", 35.53125, 43],
["/Users/nakilon/.../ruby take.rb", 3.20703125, 41],
["/Users/nakilon/.../bin/paster", 1.89453125, 14]]}]
...
Now just replace the require "pp"; pp args with something like this:
Nakischema.validate args, [[
Time,
NilClass,
{
hash: {
total: 3..3,
each: {
size: 3..3,
each: [[/\A\/Users\//, Float, Fixnum]],
},
},
assertions: [-> h,_ { h[:total] == h[:each].size }],
},
]]Imagine you don't want a number higher than 5 (unless it's 10):
Nakischema.validate [1, 10, 7], {
each: [
{ assertions: [-> x, _ {
x <= 5
} ] },
10..10,
],
}expected at least one of 2 rules to match the 7, errors: (Nakischema::Error)
custom assertion failed (at [:"#2", :"variant#0", :"assertion#0"])
expected 10..10 != 7 (at [:"#2", :"variant#1"])
To replace the generic "custom assertion failed" message with something more useful you can raise the Nakischema::Error manually (don't forget to return true otherwise):
Nakischema.validate [1, 10, 7], {
each: [
{ assertions: [-> x, _ {
raise Nakischema::Error.new "#{x} is too much" unless x <= 5
true
} ] },
10..10,
],
}expected at least one of 2 rules to match the 7, errors: (Nakischema::Error)
7 is too much (at [:"#2", :"variant#0", :"assertion#0"])
expected 10..10 != 7 (at [:"#2", :"variant#1"])
Initially I wanted to call it something like "SchemaValidator" but:
$ gem search schema | grep valid
...
schema-validator (0.0.1)
schema_validations (2.3.0)
schema_validator (0.1.1)
validates_by_schema (0.4.0)
validates_schema (1.1.3)
...
$ gem search schema | wc -l
288
- make some tests and GitHub Action for them
- consider replacing
.is_a?with.respond_to? - ability to assert at the same time the range and class (like is it's float or integer)