Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No did-you-mean-to-call error on casts Part 2 #42779

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Feb 12, 2021

Conversation

sandersn
Copy link
Member

Now starring skipParentheses

I chose to do the ad-hoc check rather than yet another tree walk.

1. It's faster to run and easier to read.
2. This error came from looking at real code. It happened twice, so I
think the best estimate for other uses that happened zero times is in
fact zero.
3. I couldn't think of other places to put the cast, given the
restrictions on `testedNode` just before the new code.
@typescript-bot typescript-bot added Author: Team For Uncommitted Bug PR for untriaged, rejected, closed or missing bug labels Feb 12, 2021
@sandersn sandersn merged commit 5deb676 into master Feb 12, 2021
@sandersn sandersn deleted the no-did-you-mean-to-call-error-on-casts branch February 12, 2021 18:08
@DanielRosenwasser DanielRosenwasser restored the no-did-you-mean-to-call-error-on-casts branch February 12, 2021 18:08
@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

@typescript-bot cherry-pick this to release-4.2

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Feb 12, 2021

Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the task to cherry-pick this into release-4.2 on this PR at 2a28812. You can monitor the build here.

@sandersn sandersn deleted the no-did-you-mean-to-call-error-on-casts branch February 12, 2021 18:08
@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @DanielRosenwasser, I couldn't open a PR with the cherry-pick. (You can check the log here). You may need to squash and pick this PR into release-4.2 manually.

@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

@typescript-bot cherry-pick this to release-4.2

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

typescript-bot commented Feb 16, 2021

Heya @DanielRosenwasser, I've started to run the task to cherry-pick this into release-4.2 on this PR at 2a28812. You can monitor the build here.

@typescript-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @DanielRosenwasser, I've opened #42820 for you.

typescript-bot pushed a commit to typescript-bot/TypeScript that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2021
Component commits:
214ef0c No did-you-mean-to-call error on casts
I chose to do the ad-hoc check rather than yet another tree walk.

1. It's faster to run and easier to read.
2. This error came from looking at real code. It happened twice, so I
think the best estimate for other uses that happened zero times is in
fact zero.
3. I couldn't think of other places to put the cast, given the
restrictions on `testedNode` just before the new code.

1d34778 Merge branch 'master' into no-did-you-mean-to-call-error-on-casts

b3be79a Skip parentheses

2a28812 Merge branch 'master' into no-did-you-mean-to-call-error-on-casts
DanielRosenwasser pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 16, 2021
Component commits:
214ef0c No did-you-mean-to-call error on casts
I chose to do the ad-hoc check rather than yet another tree walk.

1. It's faster to run and easier to read.
2. This error came from looking at real code. It happened twice, so I
think the best estimate for other uses that happened zero times is in
fact zero.
3. I couldn't think of other places to put the cast, given the
restrictions on `testedNode` just before the new code.

1d34778 Merge branch 'master' into no-did-you-mean-to-call-error-on-casts

b3be79a Skip parentheses

2a28812 Merge branch 'master' into no-did-you-mean-to-call-error-on-casts

Co-authored-by: Nathan Shively-Sanders <nathansa@microsoft.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Author: Team For Uncommitted Bug PR for untriaged, rejected, closed or missing bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants