Fix incorrect ProGuard rules that allowed shrinking volatile felds

Fixes #1564
Kotlin · Dec 10, 2020 · 562bf20 · 562bf20
1 parent 1176267
commit 562bf20
Showing 1 changed file with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/kotlinx-coroutines-core/jvm/resources/META-INF/proguard/coroutines.pro b/kotlinx-coroutines-core/jvm/resources/META-INF/proguard/coroutines.pro
@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
 -keepnames class kotlinx.coroutines.CoroutineExceptionHandler {}
 
 # Most of volatile fields are updated with AFU and should not be mangled
--keepclassmembernames class kotlinx.** {
+-keepclassmembers class kotlinx.** {
     volatile <fields>;
 }
 
 # Same story for the standard library's SafeContinuation that also uses AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater
--keepclassmembernames class kotlin.coroutines.SafeContinuation {
+-keepclassmembers class kotlin.coroutines.SafeContinuation {
     volatile <fields>;
 }