Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't mark generated linked atomic queues as final #234

Merged

Conversation

kay
Copy link
Contributor

@kay kay commented Mar 3, 2019

Reported in #208, fixed but subsequent regressed as fix edited generated
source. This change should fix it permanently.

Reported in JCTools#208, fixed but subsequent regressed as fix edited generated
source. This change should fix it permanently.
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 495

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 47.61%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 493: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 1673
Relevant Lines: 3514

💛 - Coveralls

@nitsanw nitsanw merged commit fbef849 into JCTools:master Mar 6, 2019
writer.write(cu.toString());
} finally {
if (writer != null) {
writer.close();
}
}
System.out.println("Saved to " + outputFile);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Debugging code snuck in?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants