Add new categories and uses to the Default Taxonomy

[ThomasLaPiana]

Closes #142
Closes #141

Description Of Changes

Link to Data Categories Sheet
Link to Data Uses Sheet

Follow-Up Issue for Docs: https://github.com/ethyca/fideslang/issues/150

NOTE: CI fixes happening here: https://github.com/ethyca/fideslang/pull/145

All of the changes we make here will need to get listed out for the corresponding migration PR over in Fides

Code Changes

• add new data categories
• add new data uses
• add additional assertions to the tests for additional data integrity checks

Steps to Confirm

• list any manual steps taken to confirm the changes

Pre-Merge Checklist

• All CI Pipelines Succeeded
• Documentation Updated (Authors note: New files generated for the docs site)
• Issue Requirements are Met
• Update CHANGELOG.md

[ThomasLaPiana]

@NevilleS I'm thinking this needs a 2.0 bump? These are pretty large changes, and will definitely break things as we don't have proper versioning in yet

[ThomasLaPiana]

I'm investigating CI failures here due to our friend PyYaml and Cython: yaml/pyyaml#736

[ThomasLaPiana]

@pattisdr will merging this hinder your in-flight work in any way?

[pattisdr]

Not sure, you seem to be working in different files though. Either way we both have items that need to get in this sprint so I'd just go for it when you're ready -

[pattisdr]

@ThomasLaPiana Large effort here!

Reviewed by comparing taxonomy files to this confluence doc. I understand there have been other conversations since this doc and it is outdated in places so I'll leave the details for you to sort -

Nice testing additions as well. Another nice test to add might be one to make sure all the parents (and their parents, etc) exist.

[ThomasLaPiana]

@pattisdr the review here is kind of confusing...

I was given a CSV file and told that it is the intended end-state of the taxonomy (one CSV for each type actually, categories and uses)

I converted those CSV files into google sheets and marked them up/had comments as per the linked sheets at the top of the PR

Anything that isn't in that file, I took as an explicit flag to remove it from the current taxonomy. There was additional discussion in the comments around what to do with certain fields

Hugely appreciate the thorough review here! I know it's hard to follow, I want @rsilvery to chime in as well and confirm the CSV in this PR matches the requirements. This is very detail-oriented work and deserves a lot of eyes on to verify my changes!

[pattisdr]

thanks for your changes here - approved with the addition of the missing parent fides key item

[rsilvery]

Is there still something I need to review here? I don't get GH notifications in a timely way so please ping me on Slack if so.