Skip to content

Babel macro that allows you to use a flutter like render syntax

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

Grohden/free-from-jsx.macro

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

free-from-jsx.macro

A babel macro that transforms flutter render like syntax to jsx, allowing you to write react components almost without JSX:

Note: this is a proof of concept, and is not meant to be used in production. For that reason I'm not currently planing into publishing this in npm.

What it does?

Transforms this:

import ffj from 'free-from-jsx.macro'

const MyComponent = () => ffj(
  View({
    children: [
      Text({ children: ['Hello World'] }),
    ],
  })
);

Into this:

const MyComponent = () => (
  <View
    children={[
      <Text>Hello World</Text>
    ]}
  />
);

Plans

  • We could consider compiling directly to createReactElement calls:

All tooling may be better working with JSX... for example, preserving JSX allows plugin-transform-react-constant-elements to keep working properly

  • Implement a way to transform DOM elements:

Currently, the plugin treats all the lowercase started CallExpressions as only function calls, and therefore things like div() span() etc. are not transformed.

Current problems

DOM elements

Like said above, DOM elements seems to be treated differently in JSX, so currently it's not possible to use them (unless you rename them with PascalCase)... its ambiguous whether they are functions or components:

MyComponent({
  children: [
    // In the future we will assume some reserved keywords 
    // to be DOM elements and threat them differently
    div({ children: ["Hello World"] }),

    // Not started with upper case letter, we assume it as a function call
    myCall({ children: ["Hello World"] }),

    // Started with upper case letter, we assume it as a component
    MyOtherComp()
  ]
})

Class components and ts

Typescript will not be happy with "calling a class", so if a component is declared as class for TS, it will not type check, unfortunately.

You can hack ts though:

import React from "react";
import { View as RNView } from 'react-native';


type HackCtoFC<T extends keyof JSX.IntrinsicElements | React.JSXElementConstructor<any>> =
  React.FC<React.ComponentProps<T>>

// usage of this is typed and accepted
const View = RNView as unknown as HackCtoFC<typeof RNView>;

Note: This is too hacky in my opinion. Not sure if I would recommend this approach.

Keys

I don't know why, but using children as prop instead of implicit makes react complain about requiring keys.

<Component
  children={[
    // react complains about elements not having keys...
    <div>Hello World</div>,
    <div>Hello World</div>,
  ]}
/>

Motivations

I personally don't like JSX (XML stuff in general), and having worked with flutter previously I miss how good is to compose components in it, while we can do the same composition with JSX, it's just unreadable to have nested trees of components with JSX that uses child slots other than children:

const MyComponent = () => {
  return (
    <Foo
      title={
        <Wrap
          text={<ContextText>Hello World</ContextText>}
        />
      }
      content={[
        <SectionStyleProvider style={styles.section}>
          <RedBox
            topContent={
              <Wrap
                text={<ContextText>Hello World</ContextText>}
              />
            }
          />
          <BlueBox
            bottomContent={
              <Wrap
                text={<ContextText>Hello World</ContextText>}
              />
            }
          />
        </SectionStyleProvider>,
      ]}
    />
  );
};

Some references and maybe inspirations:

About

Babel macro that allows you to use a flutter like render syntax

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published