Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add limitation to not allow a users username or email address to be their password #2733

Open
Diane-Rose22 opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Diane-Rose22
Copy link

(Put feature request title here)

Add limitation to not allow a users username or email address to be their password

Problem

Per current NIST password recommendations, context specific password should be disallowed. This should include the context of the user themselves. The biggest breach of this would be using the same string for both a username & password.

Solution

I would like a password verification option to ensure the users password is not the same as their username/email address/name as it is currently saved in fusionauth.

Alternatives/workarounds

We have attempted to add a frontend filter to restrict the password from being the same as the username/email; however, the frontend password reset page does not and cannot know the users email address or username to verify against.

Additional context

NIST recomendation:

When processing requests to establish and change memorized secrets, verifiers SHALL compare the prospective secrets against a list that contains values known to be commonly-used, expected, or compromised. For example, the list MAY include, but is not limited to:

Passwords obtained from previous breach corpuses.
Dictionary words.
Repetitive or sequential characters (e.g. ‘aaaaaa’, ‘1234abcd’).
Context-specific words, such as the name of the service, the username, and derivatives thereof.

Community guidelines

All issues filed in this repository must abide by the FusionAuth community guidelines.

How to vote

Please give us a thumbs up or thumbs down as a reaction to help us prioritize this feature. Feel free to comment if you have a particular need or comment on how this feature should work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant