Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow additional words to be added to the disallowed password dictionary #2734

Open
Diane-Rose22 opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Diane-Rose22
Copy link

(Put feature request title here)

Allow additional words to be added to the disallowed password dictionary

Problem

A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
Per current NIST password recommendations, context specific passwords should be disallowed - for example the application name, the site URL, etc.

Solution

I would like a password requirements option to define additional words that are not allowed in passwords - where I could add my company name, my company website etc. These additional words could be checked against in the same way breached passwords are checked against when verifying a new password is valid.

Additional context

NIST recommendation - this is a subset of point 4, and an extension of ticket #2733:

When processing requests to establish and change memorized secrets, verifiers SHALL compare the prospective secrets against a list that contains values known to be commonly-used, expected, or compromised. For example, the list MAY include, but is not limited to:

Passwords obtained from previous breach corpuses.
Dictionary words.
Repetitive or sequential characters (e.g. ‘aaaaaa’, ‘1234abcd’).
Context-specific words, such as the name of the service, the username, and derivatives thereof.

Community guidelines

All issues filed in this repository must abide by the FusionAuth community guidelines.

How to vote

Please give us a thumbs up or thumbs down as a reaction to help us prioritize this feature. Feel free to comment if you have a particular need or comment on how this feature should work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant