Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow RequestParam and FileParam to target class #2405

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

flohw
Copy link
Contributor

@flohw flohw commented Mar 7, 2024

Hi,

To be consistent across the different available params and be able to place them on class, it requires to add \Attribute::TARGET_CLASS to the RequestParam and FileParam.

I added the annotation for compatibility too.

Hopefully this can be merged and release before #2400 as they may be incompatible.

Thanks

[edit]: Actions seems to be broken due to composer.json or lock file. Not sure how to resolve. Let me know if I can help on this too.

@flohw flohw requested a review from mbabker March 11, 2024 09:46
@flohw
Copy link
Contributor Author

flohw commented Apr 4, 2024

Hi @goetas

Just saw you on the pr 2401 and was seeking for the maintainer. Hopefully I reached the right person to know how we could manage this PR. 🙂

I thought it would be nice to be merged before and maybe make a release (hopefully not too late because of the last merge 😟 ) to allow a more flexible usage of the current attributes.

Please let me know if I need to target another branch or if the improvement will be merged once SF7 compatibility is achieved.

Thank you.

@goetas
Copy link
Member

goetas commented Apr 4, 2024

Ooo, I saw this too late... Sorry 😔

@mbabker
Copy link
Contributor

mbabker commented Apr 4, 2024

Ooo, I saw this too late... Sorry 😔

I did copy it into #2400 so it's there.

@flohw
Copy link
Contributor Author

flohw commented Apr 4, 2024

No problem. Thank you.

I keep an eye on the bundle as a lot of people.
Let us know if we can help on some issue or pr. I haven't seen a "good first issue" or something.

I will close this pr once the other is merged or close it now if you think it's more appropriate.

@flohw
Copy link
Contributor Author

flohw commented Apr 5, 2024

I looked at your comment and pr on the phone and didn't see that the other pr was merged and a release was made.

Thank you for allowing the update! 🙂

@flohw flohw closed this Apr 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants