feat(webpack-dev-server): contentBasePublicPath from v3.10

[peterblazejewicz]

• property added
• test update
• version bump

Thanks!

Please fill in this template.

• Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.

• Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)

• Add or edit tests to reflect the change. (Run with npm test.)

• Run npm run lint package-name (or tsc if no tslint.json is present).

• Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes:
  feat(server): add contentBasePublicPath option webpack/webpack-dev-server#2150
  That's undocumented due to pending PR:
  docs(dev-server): fix contentBasePublicPath example webpack/webpack.js.org#3291

[typescript-bot]

👋 Hi there! I’ve run some quick measurements against master and your PR. These metrics should help the humans reviewing this PR gauge whether it might negatively affect compile times or editor responsiveness for users who install these typings.

Let’s review the numbers, shall we?

Comparison details 📊

	master	#41962	diff
Batch compilation
Memory usage (MiB)	72.8	70.8	-2.7%
Type count	11291	11293	0%
Assignability cache size	1436	1436	0%
Language service
Samples taken	127	128	+1%
Identifiers in tests	127	128	+1%
getCompletionsAtPosition
Mean duration (ms)	409.2	412.6	+0.8%
Mean CV	9.6%	9.6%
Worst duration (ms)	509.8	577.6	+13.3%
Worst identifier	custom	json
getQuickInfoAtPosition
Mean duration (ms)	412.5	413.1	+0.1%
Mean CV	10.2%	10.2%	0.0%
Worst duration (ms)	518.6	507.3	-2.2%
Worst identifier	get	res

It looks like nothing changed too much. I won’t post performance data again unless it gets worse.

[typescript-bot]

@peterblazejewicz Thank you for submitting this PR!

🔔 @maestroh @daveparslow @ZheyangSong @alan-agius4 @arturovt @davecardwell @dobogo @billy-le @chrispaterson - please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

If no reviewer appears after a week, a DefinitelyTyped maintainer will review the PR instead.

[chrispaterson]

Looks good to me

[typescript-bot]

A definition owner has approved this PR ⭐️. A maintainer will merge this PR shortly. If it shouldn't be merged yet, please leave a comment saying so and we'll wait. Thank you for your contribution to DefinitelyTyped!