use AsyncLocalStorage instead of our home-grown solutions

[bengl]

What does this PR do?

Switches from our custom implementation(s) of AsyncLocalStorage to the one provided by Node.js.

Motivation

There's no need to maintain our own implementation of AsyncLocalStorage when Node.js provides it for us. Also, switching to stock AsyncLocalStorage will enable the usage of TracingChannel in the future.

Additional Notes

The comment in the file that selected a storage implementation suggested just using AsyncLocalStorage once it supports triggerAsyncResource(). That said, literally zero of our code uses triggerAsyncResource(), so this is assumed to be historical and no longer relevant.

Security

Datadog employees:

• If this PR touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from @DataDog/security-design-and-guidance.
• This PR doesn't touch any of that.

[github-actions]

Overall package size

Self size: 6.24 MB
Deduped: 60.72 MB
No deduping: 61 MB

Dependency sizes

name	version	self size	total size
@datadog/native-iast-taint-tracking	1.7.0	16.71 MB	16.72 MB
@datadog/native-appsec	7.1.0	14.37 MB	14.38 MB
@datadog/pprof	5.2.0	8.84 MB	9.21 MB
protobufjs	7.2.5	2.77 MB	6.56 MB
@datadog/native-iast-rewriter	2.3.0	2.15 MB	2.24 MB
@opentelemetry/core	1.14.0	872.87 kB	1.47 MB
@datadog/native-metrics	2.0.0	898.77 kB	1.3 MB
@opentelemetry/api	1.4.1	780.32 kB	780.32 kB
import-in-the-middle	1.7.3	67.62 kB	731.01 kB
msgpack-lite	0.1.26	201.16 kB	281.59 kB
opentracing	0.14.7	194.81 kB	194.81 kB
semver	7.5.4	93.4 kB	123.8 kB
pprof-format	2.1.0	111.69 kB	111.69 kB
@datadog/sketches-js	2.1.0	109.9 kB	109.9 kB
lodash.sortby	4.7.0	75.76 kB	75.76 kB
lru-cache	7.14.0	74.95 kB	74.95 kB
ipaddr.js	2.1.0	60.23 kB	60.23 kB
ignore	5.2.4	51.22 kB	51.22 kB
int64-buffer	0.1.10	49.18 kB	49.18 kB
shell-quote	1.8.1	44.96 kB	44.96 kB
istanbul-lib-coverage	3.2.0	29.34 kB	29.34 kB
tlhunter-sorted-set	0.1.0	24.94 kB	24.94 kB
limiter	1.1.5	23.17 kB	23.17 kB
dc-polyfill	0.1.4	23.1 kB	23.1 kB
retry	0.13.1	18.85 kB	18.85 kB
node-abort-controller	3.1.1	16.89 kB	16.89 kB
jest-docblock	29.7.0	8.99 kB	12.76 kB
crypto-randomuuid	1.0.0	11.18 kB	11.18 kB
path-to-regexp	0.1.7	6.78 kB	6.78 kB
koalas	1.0.2	6.47 kB	6.47 kB
methods	1.1.2	5.29 kB	5.29 kB
module-details-from-path	1.0.3	4.47 kB	4.47 kB

_{🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.53%. Comparing base (71e585f) to head (34c7aa2).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4201      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.23%   84.53%   -0.70%     
==========================================
  Files         247      247              
  Lines       10956    10956              
  Branches       33       33              
==========================================
- Hits         9338     9262      -76     
- Misses       1618     1694      +76     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[simon-id]

profiler test failing otherwise LGTM

[Qard]

Ah, right. Profiler is using those channels to build their code hotspots linkage to trace info. We'll need to coordinate with them to switch that to their own separate use of async_hooks for those lifecycle events. Ideally I'd like to have a better way to do that linking. 🤔

[szegedi]

We'll obviously have to investigate this, but off the top of your head do you have an inkling what behavioral difference in stock AsyncLocalStorage vs. our current implementation causes the failure?

[Qard]

Basically you just need to replace your use of dd-trace:storage:before and dd-trace:storage:after channels to use the async_hooks before and after events.