Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added nightly/manual CI jobs for dd-trace-go macrobenchmarks #2106

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

igoragoli
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

This PR sets up nightly/manual CI jobs for running dd-trace-go macrobenchmarks, in order to migrate the Go Macrobenchmark from the KTG/Reliability Environment (see datadog-reliability-env/apps/go/prof-app) to the Benchmarking Platform.

Motivation

Related issue

Describe how to test/QA your changes

The adequate execution of the added CI jobs can be verified in the following pipeline:
#17672789

Reviewer's Checklist

  • Changed code has unit tests for its functionality.
  • If this interacts with the agent in a new way, a system test has been added.

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jul 11, 2023

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2023-07-26 08:32:03

Comparing candidate commit 6f279d1 in PR branch igoragoli/add_go_macrobenchmark with baseline commit eaa593d in branch main.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 27 metrics, 0 unstable metrics.

@igoragoli igoragoli changed the title Added dd-trace-go macrobenchmarks (only manual execution, currently) Added nightly/manual CI jobs for dd-trace-go macrobenchmarks Jul 11, 2023
@igoragoli igoragoli marked this pull request as ready for review July 11, 2023 14:40
@igoragoli igoragoli requested review from a team as code owners July 11, 2023 14:40
@igoragoli igoragoli marked this pull request as draft July 18, 2023 08:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant