-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 131
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add lossy aggregator mode to reduce contention #282
Open
rishabh
wants to merge
10
commits into
DataDog:master
Choose a base branch
from
rishabh:rish/lossy-aggregator-mode
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5549474
Add fast pseudo-random float64
rishabh 0487b32
Add lossy aggregator mode
rishabh a16c351
Clean up comments
rishabh a749342
Make the pools local to the aggregator
rishabh d2d4773
Faster tag concatenation for more/larger tags
rishabh e994111
Fix tests related to telemetry changes
rishabh 827abf7
unexport lossy buffer receivers
rishabh ba2b31d
Benchmark both extended aggregated metrics and non-extended aggregate…
rishabh 624cd8d
Flush sample threshold should be configurable
rishabh ec2ce20
Clean up comments
rishabh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would be curious to have results of both versions. This is a crucial part of the client performance, it might be interesting to write them in the PR description.
I don't think there will be any difference but I'm also wondering how's the hashing performing once in the map.