Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide option to look into xcconfigs for common build settings. #722

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2019

Conversation

dnkoutso
Copy link
Contributor

@dnkoutso dnkoutso commented Oct 30, 2019

See CocoaPods/CocoaPods#9233 for more info

Copy link
Member

@amorde amorde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, seems like this was definitely a hole in the API

@@ -83,8 +87,8 @@ def resolved_build_setting(key, resolve_against_xcconfig = false)
#
# @return [String] The value of the build setting.
#
def common_resolved_build_setting(key)
values = resolved_build_setting(key).values.compact.uniq
def common_resolved_build_setting(key, resolve_against_xcconfig = false)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can this please be a keyword argument?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

on it.

@dnkoutso dnkoutso force-pushed the common_build_settings_xcconfig branch from 3805f93 to 4ca29ab Compare October 30, 2019 20:44
@dnkoutso
Copy link
Contributor Author

Done, spoke offline that this is good to merge after changing to use keyword argument.

Merging.

@dnkoutso dnkoutso merged commit 15c9005 into CocoaPods:master Oct 30, 2019
@dnkoutso dnkoutso deleted the common_build_settings_xcconfig branch October 30, 2019 20:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants