Add OwnedBytes and SizedBytes to clvm-utils

[Rigidity]

No description provided.

[coveralls-official]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8896470441

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 70 of 98 (71.43%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
• 43 unchanged lines in 5 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-0.1%) to 84.705%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
crates/clvm-utils/src/owned_atom.rs	34	46	73.91%
crates/clvm-utils/src/sized_atom.rs	36	52	69.23%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
crates/chia-consensus/src/gen/owned_conditions.rs	3	91.3%
crates/chia-consensus/src/error.rs	3	0.0%
wheel/src/run_generator.rs	7	71.79%
crates/chia-bls/src/signature.rs	11	95.96%
crates/chia-bls/src/gtelement.rs	19	59.79%

Totals
Change from base Build 8882765605:	-0.1%
Covered Lines:	11846
Relevant Lines:	13985

---

💛 - Coveralls

[arvidn]

I would have expected this crate to contain traits, and that the concrete implementations would be defined in some other crate

[Rigidity]

I would have expected this crate to contain traits, and that the concrete implementations would be defined in some other crate

Should these go in clvm-utils?

[Rigidity]

These might be too redundant with chia-protocol, I'll hold off on this for now.