-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 323
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Django Upgrade] [ENG-4072] The Rest - Part 2 #10072
Merged
cslzchen
merged 12 commits into
CenterForOpenScience:feature/django_upgrade
from
cslzchen:the-rest-of-the-fixes
Oct 10, 2022
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bfc5b8c
Fix missing or insufficient permission test for amdin preprints view
cslzchen b927676
Fix admin user view tests by using HTTP response headers object
cslzchen a61cd1b
Fix duplicate view_node permissions in node and instn view tests
cslzchen 21bfede
Rework refresh_from_db() to reload GFKs
cslzchen ca45a2a
Fix visible contributor query
cslzchen 0375a5a
Fix handle_archive_fail and its tests
cslzchen b3aa28d
Use a different schema to fix tests failure due to django3 upgrade
9b30044
Update URLs for URL Validation tests with Django 3
cslzchen 75a99e2
Revert "Fix an issue where get_node() is not avaialbe from context view"
cslzchen b311d18
Improve to_internal_value() in NodeRelationshipField
cslzchen 227ee3a
Add alt fixtures to prevent both siblings & parent/child conflicts
cslzchen 16f7a3a
Fix linked_by_nodes in node related counts test
cslzchen File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -108,10 +108,20 @@ def reload(self): | |
|
||
def refresh_from_db(self, **kwargs): | ||
super(BaseModel, self).refresh_from_db(**kwargs) | ||
# Django's refresh_from_db does not uncache GFKs | ||
for field in self._meta.private_fields: | ||
if hasattr(field, 'cache_attr') and field.cache_attr in self.__dict__: | ||
del self.__dict__[field.cache_attr] | ||
# Since Django 2.2, any cached relations are cleared from the reloaded instance. | ||
# See https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.2/ref/models/instances/#django.db.models.Model.refresh_from_db | ||
# However, the default `refresh_from_db()` doesn't refresh related fields. Neither can we refresh related | ||
# field(s) since it will inevitably cause infinite loop; and Many/One-to-Many relations add to the complexity. | ||
# The recommended behavior is to explicitly refresh the fields when necessary. In order to preserve pre-upgrade | ||
# behavior, our customization only reloads GFKs. | ||
for f in self._meta._get_fields(reverse=False): | ||
# Note: the following `if` condition is how django internally identifies GFK | ||
if f.is_relation and f.many_to_one and not (hasattr(f.remote_field, 'model') and f.remote_field.model): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Only refresh GFK, which is |
||
if hasattr(self, f.name): | ||
try: | ||
getattr(self, f.name).refresh_from_db() | ||
except AttributeError: | ||
continue | ||
|
||
def clone(self): | ||
"""Create a new, unsaved copy of this object.""" | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
private_fields
is notGFK
thoughGFK
seems to be inprivate_fields