Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade eslint-plugin-react from 7.4.0 to 7.19.0 #22

Closed

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade eslint-plugin-react from 7.4.0 to 7.19.0.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.
  • The recommended version is 33 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a month ago, on 2020-03-06.
Release notes
Package name: eslint-plugin-react from eslint-plugin-react GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: eslint-plugin-react
  • e2ed536 Update CHANGELOG and bump version
  • 5959b5f [fix] `prefer-stateless-function`: avoid crash on ts empty constructor
  • e231f44 [tests] `no-unescaped-entities`: skip test cases that are now parsing errors in acorn-jsx@5.2.0
  • 434b45f [Dev Deps] update `@types/eslint`, `@types/estree`, `@types/node`, `eslint-plugin-eslint-plugin`, `eslint-plugin-import`, `typescript`
  • a917dda [Deps] update `resolve`, `xregexp`
  • 09608cc [Fix] `no-adjacent-inline-elements`: avoid a crash
  • b833535 [Fix] `no-unused-prop-types`: Change the reporting to point to a more accurate node
  • edc5fe2 [New] `style-prop-object`: Add `allow` option
  • 9b5d6aa [Fix] `self-closing-comp`: consider JSXMemberExpression as component too
  • 598277e [New] `jsx-pascal-case`: Support unicode characters
  • 43e466c [readme] Small visual inconsistency
  • 03edb68 [docs] add `react/` prefix to rule name, for consistency
  • b517b9e [Fix] `no-unused-prop-types`: make `markPropTypesAsUsed` work with `TSEmptyBodyFunctionExpression` AST node
  • 66c0d66 [Fix] `displayName` (but really, `propTypes` detection): do not crash on empty flow type spreads
  • 0a717a5 Update CHANGELOG and bump version
  • 8b576be [Fix] `jsx-indent`: don't check literals not within JSX
  • 37c4ef3 Update CHANGELOG and bump version
  • 3da6eb3 [Fix] `jsx-indent`: avoid a crash on non-string literals
  • 000d6b8 Update CHANGELOG and bump version
  • ffdf69a [Fix] `jsx-indent`: Does not check indents for JSXText
  • 182b045 [Docs] use `markdown-magic` to automatically sort all rules alphabetically
  • 45b9d32 [Docs] `jsx-props-no-spreading`: fix typo to use correct rule
  • f9aee94 [Fix] `jsx-props-no-spreading`: add support for namespaced jsx components
  • e69b113 [Fix] `jsx-no-target-blank`: allow rel to be an expression

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #22 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #22   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.07%   55.07%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         207      207           
  Branches       44       44           
=======================================
  Hits          114      114           
  Misses         85       85           
  Partials        8        8           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update fc2d69d...02b18d7. Read the comment docs.

@BrianLusina BrianLusina deleted the snyk-upgrade-69bbfe9d60356bea99577189d8cc8c67 branch July 13, 2020 08:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants