Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/js signoff pipeline #29442

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix/js signoff pipeline #29442

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

aditishree1
Copy link
Contributor

@aditishree1 aditishree1 commented Apr 25, 2024

Packages impacted by this PR

@azure/cosmos

Issues associated with this PR

Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

This PR fixes the failed tests by mainly addressing following issues:

  • JSBI comparison was giving error after JSBI version upgrade.
  • '.ts' extension was not getting identified while running tests.
  • issues with flaky tests and container leakage

What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR chosen?

Are there test cases added in this PR? (If not, why?)

Provide a list of related PRs (if any)

Command used to generate this PR:**(Applicable only to SDK release request PRs)

Checklists

  • Added impacted package name to the issue description
  • Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** (If so, create an Issue in the Autorest/typescript repository and link it here)
  • Added a changelog (if necessary)

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

API change check

API changes are not detected in this pull request.

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ function encodeNumberAsUInt64JSBI(value: number): JSBI {
const rawValueBits = getRawBitsJSBI(value);
const mask = JSBI.BigInt(0x8000000000000000);
const returned =
rawValueBits < mask
JSBI.toNumber(rawValueBits) < JSBI.toNumber(mask)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might lose precision here. is it ok?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will correct this. we can use JSBI.greaterThan() instead.

@v1k1
Copy link
Member

v1k1 commented Apr 30, 2024

@aditishree1 Please add details about these changes in the PR "Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR" section.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants