Hotfix: Perform gofmt on the repo to fix linting #3580
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SudoBrendan
requested review from
jewzaam,
bennerv,
hawkowl,
rogbas,
petrkotas,
jharrington22,
cblecker,
cadenmarchese,
UlrichSchlueter,
s-amann,
Shivkumar13,
yjst2012,
jaitaiwan,
anshulvermapatel,
hlipsig and
tiguelu
as code owners
SudoBrendan
changed the title
shubhadapaithankar
approved these changes
May 14, 2024
mociarain
approved these changes
May 15, 2024
AldoFusterTurpin
approved these changes
May 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue this PR addresses:
Fixes linting issues found on master branch, it's the resulting diff of running
make validate-goon the current trunk.What this PR does / why we need it:
Test plan for issue:
Run
make ci-rplocally without caching.Is there any documentation that needs to be updated for this PR?
How do you know this will function as expected in production?