Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multi-tenant support #2045

Closed
wants to merge 23 commits into from
Closed

Multi-tenant support #2045

wants to merge 23 commits into from

Conversation

schananas
Copy link
Contributor

Changes required in framework to support Multitenant extension

@schananas schananas self-assigned this Dec 16, 2021
@schananas schananas added the Status: In Progress Use to signal this issue is actively worked on. label Dec 16, 2021
@smcvb smcvb changed the title Multiteant support Multi-tenant support Dec 21, 2021
database.trace.db Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@smcvb
Copy link
Member

smcvb commented Feb 8, 2022

@schananas and I have discussed all my comments during a video meeting, resolving all arguments for the time being.

smcvb and others added 23 commits March 25, 2022 13:16
Add patch updates to the main dependabot.yml. Apparently dependabot only
 checks for the base branch, where they're not planning to change this
 either - dependabot/dependabot-core#2159
Hence, let's add it to the main dependabot file
Ignore patch updates for the main branch, since those are taken care of
by the patch branch.
Signed-off-by: Nils Christian Ehmke <nils@rhocas.de>
Add catch clause to log a dedicated warning for testing clarity

#167
…ngboot/autoconfig/AxonServerBusAutoConfiguration.java

Co-authored-by: Steven van Beelen <steven.vanbeelen@axoniq.io>
…ngboot/autoconfig/AxonServerBusAutoConfiguration.java

Co-authored-by: Steven van Beelen <steven.vanbeelen@axoniq.io>
@schananas schananas closed this Mar 25, 2022
@smcvb smcvb added Status: Resolved Use to signal that work on this issue is done. Status: Obsolete Use to signal this issue is no longer necessary. and removed Status: In Progress Use to signal this issue is actively worked on. Status: Resolved Use to signal that work on this issue is done. labels Mar 25, 2022
@smcvb
Copy link
Member

smcvb commented Mar 25, 2022

This PR has been replaced for #2156.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority 2: Should High priority. Ideally, these issues are part of the release they’re assigned to. Status: Obsolete Use to signal this issue is no longer necessary. Type: Feature Use to signal an issue is completely new to the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants