Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to core-js@3. #38660

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 15, 2020
Merged

Upgrade to core-js@3. #38660

merged 9 commits into from
Jan 15, 2020

Conversation

sgomes
Copy link
Contributor

@sgomes sgomes commented Jan 6, 2020

It's starting to take a toll to still use core-js@2, since we're missing important features: Object.fromEntries, Array.flat, globalThis, URL, to name a few. We've been adding support for some of these with individual polyfills, but it's time to take the leap and move over to core-js@3, to ensure our development environment stays representative of the current state of the JS spec.

This will initially result in some code duplication, as unfortunately we use several packages with a hardcoded dependency on core-js@2. Hopefully, over time, we'll be able to replace these packages with more modern ones, or update them ourselves to be compatible with core-js@3.

Changes proposed in this Pull Request

  • Update the core-js package to the current version.
  • Set the core-js version in the babel config.
  • Drop @babel/polyfill and use core-js directly.
  • Remove superfluous polyfills (e.g. @webcomponents/url).
  • Remove superfluous polyfill module replacements in evergreen.
  • Modify server entry point to use boot/polyfills rather than its own code.
  • Minor lint fixes.

Testing instructions

This change affects all of Calypso, so please be sure to try using it as much as possible both in newer browsers, which should use the evergreen build (that includes fewer polyfills); and in older browsers (particularly IE11), which should use the fallback build (that includes all polyfills).

Potential areas of interest: anything that does URL processing (e.g. sharing from Reader), and anything that uses globalThis (e.g. language switching).

@sgomes sgomes added Framework [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. Build [Type] Janitorial labels Jan 6, 2020
@sgomes sgomes requested review from ockham, jsnajdr, nbloomf and a team January 6, 2020 16:41
@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

@@ -1,24 +1,23 @@
/**
* External dependencies
*/
import '@babel/polyfill';
import 'core-js/stable';
import 'regenerator-runtime/runtime';
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: we need to depend on this directly now, as it used to be included by @babel/polyfill, but it's not in core-js/stable. See https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/blob/master/docs/2019-03-19-core-js-3-babel-and-a-look-into-the-future.md#babelpolyfill

@sgomes sgomes added [Status] In Progress and removed [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. labels Jan 6, 2020
@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 6, 2020

Marking the PR as "In Progress" while I track down some IE11 bugs.

Copy link
Member

@jsnajdr jsnajdr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The boot/polyfills module would deserve its own NPM package (@automattic/calypso-polyfills?) 🙂 We'll need to import it in the wp-desktop app, too, together with starting to build it with calypso-build, and remove custom/duplicate code like parts of Automattic/wp-desktop#733

apps/notifications/src/standalone/index.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 7, 2020

String.split seems to be behaving differently in this branch, in IE 11.

The following code produces very different output between production and this branch:

var x = "By continuing, you agree to our {{tosLink}}Terms of Service{{/tosLink}}.";
x.split( /(\{\{\/?\s*\w+\s*\/?\}\})/g );

This generates an array with 5 items (as expected) in production, and 143 (!) in this branch.

There appears to be a bug in core-js@3.6.1: zloirock/core-js#741 . Trying update to latest version (3.6.2), released today.

@matticbot
Copy link
Contributor

matticbot commented Jan 7, 2020

Here is how your PR affects size of JS and CSS bundles shipped to the user's browser:

App Entrypoints (~31556 bytes added 📈 [gzipped])

name                   parsed_size           gzip_size
entry-main                +69060 B  (+4.3%)   +15703 B  (+4.0%)
entry-login               +69060 B  (+6.3%)   +15705 B  (+5.5%)
entry-domains-landing      +9369 B  (+1.7%)     +148 B  (+0.1%)

Common code that is always downloaded and parsed every time the app is loaded, no matter which route is used.

Sections (~29751 bytes removed 📉 [gzipped])

name              parsed_size            gzip_size
theme               -139480 B  (-35.3%)   -30798 B  (-31.5%)
themes                -2785 B   (-0.9%)     +329 B   (+0.4%)
plugins               -2785 B   (-0.6%)     +329 B   (+0.3%)
hosting               -2785 B   (-1.2%)     +329 B   (+0.5%)
woocommerce           +1269 B   (+0.1%)      +20 B   (+0.0%)
settings-writing      +1269 B   (+0.3%)      +20 B   (+0.0%)
post-editor           +1269 B   (+0.1%)      +20 B   (+0.0%)

Sections contain code specific for a given set of routes. Is downloaded and parsed only when a particular route is navigated to.

Async-loaded Components (~6529 bytes added 📈 [gzipped])

name                                parsed_size           gzip_size
async-load-design-blocks               +12764 B  (+0.5%)    +2171 B  (+0.3%)
async-load-design-playground           +11495 B  (+0.7%)    +2151 B  (+0.6%)
async-load-design                      +11495 B  (+0.6%)    +2151 B  (+0.5%)
async-load-reader-search-stream         +1755 B  (+1.8%)      +28 B  (+0.1%)
async-load-reader-following-manage      +1755 B  (+1.4%)      +28 B  (+0.1%)

React components that are loaded lazily, when a certain part of UI is displayed for the first time.

Legend

What is parsed and gzip size?

Parsed Size: Uncompressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much code needs to be parsed and stored in memory.
Gzip Size: Compressed size of the JS and CSS files. This much data needs to be downloaded over network.

Generated by performance advisor bot at iscalypsofastyet.com.

@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 7, 2020

Back on track, after updating to core-js@3.6.2; no more obvious errors on IE 11. Placing back under 'Needs Review'.

@sgomes sgomes added [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. and removed [Status] In Progress labels Jan 7, 2020
@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 7, 2020

@jsnajdr This PR appears to significantly inflate bundle sizes, upwards of 14KB (compressed!) for most entry points (I verified the bot's results and they appear to be correct). If we are to deploy this, we should probably prioritise getting rid of the remnants of core-js@2 quickly.

@jsnajdr
Copy link
Member

jsnajdr commented Jan 7, 2020

This PR appears to significantly inflate bundle sizes, upwards of 14KB (compressed!)

Yes, that's expected 🙂 Let's remove the offending libraries in the following few days.

@sgomes sgomes force-pushed the update/use-core-js-3 branch 2 times, most recently from ffb4577 to fda33e6 Compare January 8, 2020 10:13
@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 8, 2020

After rebasing, all tests are now green.

@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 8, 2020

Rebased again, this time due to #38688.

@blowery
Copy link
Contributor

blowery commented Jan 8, 2020

The latest bundle size reports seem a bit odd. Removed 56k from entrypoints? Maybe the report is just bad?

@blowery
Copy link
Contributor

blowery commented Jan 13, 2020

This is still very much suboptimal, however.

Yup, totally agreed

The real solution here, as I see it, is to bite the bullet and roll out our own react-virtualized, based on the current master.

Maybe we could offer assistance to maintain it? Or do you think forking is worth it?

@jsnajdr
Copy link
Member

jsnajdr commented Jan 14, 2020

The globalThis issue should be fixed now, by requiring it explicitly. It's unclear why this is required

After a fun debugging session, I discovered that we need to specify corejs: 3.6 instead of corejs: 3 to make this work.

When listing the expanded available polyfills that core-js/stable expands to, the env preset looks at the core-js-compat/modules-by-versions.json file. And this file says that es.global-this was added only in core-js@3.3. When using corejs: 3, it's coerced to 3.0.0 and fails to include this polyfill.

@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 14, 2020

The real solution here, as I see it, is to bite the bullet and roll out our own react-virtualized, based on the current master.

Maybe we could offer assistance to maintain it? Or do you think forking is worth it?

I'm just not sure our use-case matches anyone else's exactly. What we want, and probably what a lot of folks want, is for the package to include sources that they can compile, so that polyfills are all taken care of as part of the holistic build process. However, what those sources should look like is different to everyone.

For example, a lot of folks use flow, so they may be ok with using the project sources exactly as they are. We don't, so we'd need the "sources" in the package to have flow types stripped. We have support for the class properties proposal in Calypso, some other projects might not.

Perhaps we could agree on shipping an "ES20xx" build in the package, but which "xx"? And should it include JSX as-is, or have it transpiled (and if so, using which options?)

The fundamental issue is that there is no universal "source" that can be distributed to every project in such a way that it can always be compiled, so they decided to distribute a "compiled" version, and in doing so tied their library to core-js for the features where a simple syntax transform isn't enough. I can't see a generic enough solution to that problem that would be worth considering as part of the core project, but if one exists, I'm more than happy to put time towards implementing and trying to upstream it.

@jsnajdr
Copy link
Member

jsnajdr commented Jan 14, 2020

Other stable polyfills we were losing because of corejs: 3:

This helps avoid the globalThis workaround.
@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 14, 2020

The globalThis issue should be fixed now, by requiring it explicitly. It's unclear why this is required

After a fun debugging session, I discovered that we need to specify corejs: 3.6 instead of corejs: 3 to make this work.

When listing the expanded available polyfills that core-js/stable expands to, the env preset looks at the core-js-compat/modules-by-versions.json file. And this file says that es.global-this was added only in core-js@3.3. When using corejs: 3, it's coerced to 3.0.0 and fails to include this polyfill.

Excellent sleuthing, @jsnajdr 👍 I've switched back to corejs: 3.6 and removed the workaround.

@jsnajdr
Copy link
Member

jsnajdr commented Jan 14, 2020

After researching create-react-app, it turns out that standalone @automattic/calypso-polyfills package is possible and not hard to do. They do something very similar in their react-app-polyfill package.

The thing that makes this possible is the fact that when transpiling dependencies, both CRA and Calypso use env preset with the useBuiltIns: 'entry' flag and therefore expand core-js imports even in node_modules dependencies.

The Calypso dependencies are transpiled with the babel.dependencies.config.js config. And it also needs update from corejs: 2 and corejs: 3.6. It's entirely possible that part of the bundle size inflation comes from this omission!

@jsnajdr
Copy link
Member

jsnajdr commented Jan 14, 2020

However, what those sources should look like is different to everyone.

The best common denominator at this moment seems to be standard JavaScript in the latest version (at package publish time). That's also how CRA and Calypso transpile their node_modules dependencies. Standard JS without transpiling standard features like classes, ESM modules and no syntax extensions like JSX or Flow.

It shouldn't be hard to reach agreement on that. I'd prefer to avoid creating our own fork of react-virtualized, especially when we are not adding any features or fixing any serious bugs.

@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 14, 2020

The best common denominator at this moment seems to be standard JavaScript in the latest version (at package publish time). That's also how CRA and Calypso transpile their node_modules dependencies. Standard JS without transpiling standard features like classes, ESM modules and no syntax extensions like JSX or Flow.

It shouldn't be hard to reach agreement on that. I'd prefer to avoid creating our own fork of react-virtualized, especially when we are not adding any features or fixing any serious bugs.

Fair enough, I'll work on a PR and pitch the idea to the project 👍

@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 14, 2020

After researching create-react-app, it turns out that standalone @automattic/calypso-polyfills package is possible and not hard to do. They do something very similar in their react-app-polyfill package.

Looking at react-app-polyfill it does seem very doable! I'll rework the PR to turn it into a package 👍

@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 14, 2020

The Calypso dependencies are transpiled with the babel.dependencies.config.js config. And it also needs update from corejs: 2 and corejs: 3.6. It's entirely possible that part of the bundle size inflation comes from this omission!

Good catch! Fixed.

@sgomes
Copy link
Contributor Author

sgomes commented Jan 14, 2020

@jsnajdr : The polyfills have been package-ified!

Copy link
Member

@jsnajdr jsnajdr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is awesome ❤️ I love how the core-js package and other polyfills got pushed down to a leaf package.json.

packages/calypso-polyfills/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/calypso-polyfills/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/calypso-polyfills/index.node.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ const nodeModulesToTranspile = [
'striptags/',
'unicode-match-property-ecmascript/',
'unicode-match-property-value-ecmascript/',
'gridicons/',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the gridicons/ transpilation related to the CoreJS 3 upgrade?

In any case, you need to also add @automattic/calypso-polyfills to the whitelist to make it all work.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Possibly unrelated. This was a fix that was required for production builds to work locally for me, but it doesn't seem to be an issue outside of my machine. I'll remove that and double-check that everything still works fine.

@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ const nodeModulesToTranspile = [
// general form is <package-name>/.
// The trailing slash makes sure we're not matching these as prefixes
// In some cases we do want prefix style matching (lodash. for lodash.assign)
'@automattic/calypso-polyfills',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There needs to be a trailing slash here. If there isn't one, the code would also match a package name like @automattic/calypso-polyfills-blah-blah 🙂

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, I missed that, sorry!

@sgomes sgomes merged commit dcf897a into master Jan 15, 2020
@sgomes sgomes deleted the update/use-core-js-3 branch January 15, 2020 11:23
@matticbot matticbot removed the [Status] Needs Review The PR is ready for review. This also triggers e2e canary tests and wp-desktop tests automatically. label Jan 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants