Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for missing options for zowe.IDownloadAllSpoolContentParms #2025

Open
rudyflores opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers keep Issues with this label will be ignored by the stale bot priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have

Comments

@rudyflores
Copy link

Is your feature or enhancement request related to a problem or limitation? Please describe

I noticed when running a command like zowe jobs submit lf there is the following parameters:

Screenshot 2024-01-22 at 2 02 34 PM

then in the zowe.IDownloadAllSpoolContentParms which is used in Zowe Explorer API for calling downloadSpoolContent, the interface is missing most of these parameters that could be important for a user.

Describe your enhancement idea

Adding the following parameters as optional parameters from the screenshot above, this would not be a breaking change and great enhancement for our users.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Currently the alternative for one of the options like --wfo is to poll the API by making multiple API calls until the status of the Job is no longer ACTIVE, which is very inefficient.

Provide any additional context

@rudyflores rudyflores added enhancement New feature or request new The issue wasn't triaged yet labels Jan 22, 2024
Copy link

Thank you for raising this enhancement request.
The community has 90 days to vote on it.
If the enhancement receives at least 5 upvotes, it is added to our development backlog.
If it receives fewer votes, the issue is closed.

@zFernand0 zFernand0 added good first issue Good for newcomers priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have and removed new The issue wasn't triaged yet labels Jan 26, 2024
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 26, 2024
@zFernand0 zFernand0 added keep Issues with this label will be ignored by the stale bot and removed Stale labels Apr 30, 2024
@zFernand0
Copy link
Member

Maybe we should add good first issue to the list of labels we want to avoid making stale and closing 😋

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers keep Issues with this label will be ignored by the stale bot priority-low Legit issue but cosmetic or nice-to-have
Projects
Status: Low Priority
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants