Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating no-target-blank logic to only require no-referrer #2043

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 7, 2020

Conversation

seancrater
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #2022

Just a minor change to only require no-referrer rather than both noreferrer noopener.

Copy link
Member

@ljharb ljharb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Per discussion; it is in no way clear that this is an acceptable change to make.

See #2022 (comment).

@seancrater
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ljharb Probably should've noted that I only made this so it's available if the team decides to go through with it.

@seancrater
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ljharb Also shared what I found for research on the issue, I'm not sure if it's actually enough to draw a conclusion from but it seems like a pretty valid source to me.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented May 7, 2020

Reopening per #2022 (comment)

@ljharb ljharb reopened this May 7, 2020
@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented May 7, 2020

Rebased this, and kept all existing test cases rather than modifying them.

@ljharb ljharb force-pushed the no-opener-no-referrer branch 2 times, most recently from 6893aed to a8f648a Compare May 7, 2020 18:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

target=_blank rel=noreferrer implies noopener
2 participants