xUnit1041: fix for scenarios involving inheritance

[felpel]

Hi 👋

The xUnit1041 error is now being reported following the upgrade of xunit to 2.6.3.

Based on this comment and this one, is the 1.8.0 version - or any other version with aforementioned fix - of xunit.analyzers in the works/soon to be published? 🤞

If possible, it would be neat to avoid the following mitigations:

• disable the analyzer rule
• target a pre-release version of xunit.analyzers
• decorate concrete test classes with CollectionAttribute rather than the base class.

Thank you for your time!

[bradwilson]

Yes, as you've linked to, a prerelease build exists with the fix: 1.8.0-pre.2. https://xunit.net/docs/using-ci-builds

[felpel]

As I've said above:

If possible, it would be neat to avoid the following mitigations: [...] target a pre-release version of xunit.analyzers

I will rephrase my original question: can we expect a new patch release soon to include this fix?

I have no issue patching my original code, but I would prefer not to modify my dependencies, the NuGet config or the EditorConfig config if the code is to be released in less than a week or so 😅

[bradwilson]

I would prefer not to modify my dependencies, the NuGet config or the EditorConfig config if the code is to be released in less than a week or so

I can't tell you when it'll be released yet. For now you're going to have to roll back to 2.6.2 because I can't provide any solution with your restricted parameters.

[fdonnet]

Thx for the report here, it allowed me to not loose time when I upgraded xUnit.