Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

JWK Migration #632

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 24, 2022
Merged

JWK Migration #632

merged 6 commits into from
Aug 24, 2022

Conversation

denopink
Copy link
Contributor

What's included:

  • Update Argus & Bascule for jwk migration

@denopink denopink self-assigned this Aug 24, 2022
@denopink denopink added the jwk migration issues related to the jwk migration label Aug 24, 2022
@guardrails
Copy link

guardrails bot commented Aug 24, 2022 •
edited

⚠️ We detected 1 security issue in this pull request:

Vulnerable Libraries (1)
Severity Details
High github.com/hashicorp/consul/api upgrade to: 1.9.17, 1.10.10, 1.11.5

More info on how to fix Vulnerable Libraries in Go.

👉 Go to the dashboard for detailed results.

📥 Happy? Share your feedback with us.

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 24, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@denopink denopink merged commit c6083bc into main Aug 24, 2022
@denopink denopink deleted the denopink/feature/jwk-migration branch August 24, 2022 18:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@renaz6 renaz6 renaz6 approved these changes

@johnabass johnabass Awaiting requested review from johnabass

Assignees

@denopink denopink

Labels
enhancement jwk migration issues related to the jwk migration
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@denopink @renaz6