Partial struct initialization included in a coverage report

[zhiburt]

Describe the bug

Hi there,

Sometimes a structure initialization included in a coverage report but only partially.
Whereas sometimes it's not included at all.

I did tried to reproduce it by a minimal example but didn't managed easily.

Sorry if it's a duplicate.

Expected behavior

I suppose the report must be consistent in approach?

[xd009642]

The constants like "" end up being optimised out a lot of the time and don't result in instructions I can catch in the coverage instrumentation. I believe now it should just ignore constants and just simple variable assigns but not ignore function calls or more complicated expressions.

Ah just noticed the second one is a generic function. The stuff to ensure unused generic functions and methods are included in the report is over eagerly adding back in the lines 👀. I'll look into that at some point before the next release