Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

request: Support HTTP GET for persisted queries #796

Open
jeffutter opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

request: Support HTTP GET for persisted queries #796

jeffutter opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request internally-reviewed The issue has been reviewed internally.

Comments

@jeffutter
Copy link
Contributor

Component(s)

router

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

To facilitate CDN caching, we would like to have support for requesting persisted queries via HTTP Get requests.

Furthermore, some of our existing clients use this scheme and without this ability, a seamless migration to cosmo is not possible.

Describe the solution you'd like

We would like to see something similar to https://graphql.org/learn/serving-over-http/#get-request but supporting persisted queries.

Specifically supporting URLs like: https://domain.com/graphql/persisted_queries/:query_hash with variables as a query argument, the value of which is a JSON encoded map of variables.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@jeffutter jeffutter added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2024
Copy link

WunderGraph commits fully to Open Source and we want to make sure that we can help you as fast as possible.
The roadmap is driven by our customers and we have to prioritize issues that are important to them.
You can influence the priority by becoming a customer. Please contact us here.

@jensneuse jensneuse added the internally-reviewed The issue has been reviewed internally. label May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request internally-reviewed The issue has been reviewed internally.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants