- test_current.rb: 2.8 -> 3.0

[palkan]

Follow-up for #729

[koic]

👍

[palkan]

@iliabylich Maybe, we shouldn't allow failures for ruby-head?

Another idea is to migrate to Github Actions and see separate statuses for different versions in PRs. And GA will likely be faster than Travis.

I have a working configuration here which could be ported to this repo.

[iliabylich]

Maybe, we shouldn't allow failures for ruby-head?

Development branch of any repo on GH can be broken anytime. It shouldn't block us.

migrate to Github Actions and see separate statuses

I look at ruby-head/rubocop statuses only when I cut a release or if I feel that PR has some potentially breaking changes. Otherwise it's useless (again, because both can be broken)

And GA will likely be faster than Travis

I think it's fast enough. truffleruby is slow, but MRI tests take 1.5 minutes to run. Is truffleruby faster on GH actions? 👍 if so

[palkan]

Is truffleruby faster on GH actions?

Looks like slow is not the only problem 😀 Fatal error: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError https://travis-ci.org/github/whitequark/parser/jobs/723110359

Currently, I do not test against Truffle. I will check.

[iliabylich]

I've restarted the job and now it's green (this is the 2nd failure that I've seen so far).

There are a few more changes that should be done, I'll make them in a separate PR.

Thanks, merging!

[palkan]

Is truffleruby faster on GH actions?

~7-8 minutes: https://github.com/ruby-next/parser/runs/1057046471

I will try to provide a PR a bit later.

[iliabylich]

Ok, let's try it. Do you want to send a PR?

[palkan]

Do you want to send a PR?

Yeah, I will try to do that tomorrow.