Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): bump eslint-utils from 1.3.1 to 1.4.2 #9630

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 26, 2019

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Aug 26, 2019

Bumps eslint-utils from 1.3.1 to 1.4.2.

Commits
  • 4e1bc07 1.4.2
  • e4cb014 πŸ› add null test
  • 230a4e2 1.4.1
  • 08158db πŸ› fix getStaticValue security issue
  • 587cca2 πŸ› fix getStringIfConstant to handle literals correctly
  • c119e83 πŸ› fix getStaticValue to handle bigint correctly
  • 531b16f πŸ”– 1.4.0
  • 276303d βš’ upgrade rollup
  • cb518c7 πŸ› fix hasSideEffect false negative
  • aac472e πŸ› fix isParenthesized had false positive on ImportExpression (fixes #1)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot ignore this [patch|minor|major] version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor/major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot use these labels will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these reviewers will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use these assignees will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language
  • @dependabot use this milestone will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language

You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the Security Alerts page.

Bumps [eslint-utils](https://github.com/mysticatea/eslint-utils) from 1.3.1 to 1.4.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/mysticatea/eslint-utils/releases)
- [Commits](mysticatea/eslint-utils@v1.3.1...v1.4.2)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Aug 26, 2019
@jsf-clabot
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.

@webpack-bot
Copy link
Contributor

For maintainers only:

  • This need to be documented (issue in webpack/webpack.js.org will be filed when merged)

@webpack-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your pull request! The most important CI builds succeeded, we’ll review the pull request soon.

@sokra sokra merged commit 54519bd into master Aug 26, 2019
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/eslint-utils-1.4.2 branch August 26, 2019 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file PR: CI-ok PR: unreviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants