Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

In cli, why no option named "--output-file-name" ? #18352

Closed
SprayHank opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

In cli, why no option named "--output-file-name" ? #18352

SprayHank opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@SprayHank
Copy link

Feature request

add the option named "--output-file-name", and I think the function is very clear from the option name.

What is the expected behavior?
Can specify the output file name without a configuration file
What is motivation or use case for adding/changing the behavior?
Can specify the output file name without a configuration file
How should this be implemented in your opinion?
I do not read the source code yet, so I do not know now.
Are you willing to work on this yourself?
yes
@webpack webpack locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 7, 2024
@alexander-akait alexander-akait converted this issue into discussion #18387 May 7, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@SprayHank