You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Web developers are not going to test on every Windows combinations for these surprise failures that aren't documented anywhere. If this cannot be supported reliably, we should spec the operator to not support these data types from the jump.
Currently, public OS release was DML FL 4.0 on Windows 11 22H1, some operators and operand data type can't be supported reliably. Maybe we should spec these operators to not support these data types, such as int64/uint64.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lisa0314
changed the title
Consider dropping the support of uint64/int64 data type for some operators
Consider dropping the support of uint64/int64 data type for triangular
Apr 24, 2024
lisa0314
changed the title
Consider dropping the support of uint64/int64 data type for triangular
Consider dropping the support of uint64/int64 data type for some operators
Apr 24, 2024
Related to #653. Note that CoreML does not natively support 64-bit types at all. If WebNN specifies that an operator uses 64-bit types, then either the operator will not be supported on Mac, or the user agent must emulate it outside of CoreML
For DML at least, aren't we expecting that most browsers would include their own copy of the library rather than relying on whatever happens to be on the system? That would remove the need to consider older DML versions when considering data type / operator support.
As @RafaelCintron mentioned in Chromium CL-5470845 for triangular,
Currently, public OS release was DML FL 4.0 on Windows 11 22H1, some operators and operand data type can't be supported reliably. Maybe we should spec these operators to not support these data types, such as int64/uint64.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: