You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[One paragraph summary of idea, ideally copy-pasted from Explainer introduction]
In some use cases, a Web application would like to have control over the metadata attached to RTC encoded frames. One example would be adjusting timestamps to introduce a delay in playout. Another one would be relaying incoming encoded data from one or more input peer connections to one or more output PeerConnections use case 3.2.2, which requires encoded frame metadata to conform with the requirements of its destination. The proposed solution consists of a constructor for encoded frames that takes data from an existing frame + customized metadata.
Note: Fully supporting use case 3.2.2 also requires an additional API for inserting encoded frames into an RTCPeerConnection, for which a separate TAG review will be requested.
Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code):
Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: No major issues. Some details about the API surface and precise wording of the spec are under discussion at Constructor frame w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform#223
こんにちは TAG-さん!
I'm requesting a TAG review of [feature name].
[One paragraph summary of idea, ideally copy-pasted from Explainer introduction]
In some use cases, a Web application would like to have control over the metadata attached to RTC encoded frames. One example would be adjusting timestamps to introduce a delay in playout. Another one would be relaying incoming encoded data from one or more input peer connections to one or more output PeerConnections use case 3.2.2, which requires encoded frame metadata to conform with the requirements of its destination. The proposed solution consists of a constructor for encoded frames that takes data from an existing frame + customized metadata.
Note: Fully supporting use case 3.2.2 also requires an additional API for inserting encoded frames into an RTCPeerConnection, for which a separate TAG review will be requested.
https://github.com/guidou/webrtc-extensions/blob/main/relay-explainer.md
Further details:
Please provide feedback here (not on w3c/webrtc-encoded-transform#223).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: