You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be very helpful to know current browser process (tab) contribution into the total CPU load.
For example, I have a powerful machine, I am in the video conference, and also I run chromium build. CPU becomes 100% busy, but it does not make sense to reduce number of video feeds in the conference, as this will not save any visible CPU amount - most CPU is taken by build process.
In the video conference code I would analyze current process contribution, and if it is less than lets say 50%, I would avoid any CPU saving activities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have gotten this exact request a few times now from people in the web community and other stakeholders.
CPU stall pressure is currently representing global pressure, which covers many of the initial use-cases, but developers have expressed interest in getting the stall pressure for certain processes of interest, which allows the ability to understand performance impact of changes and doing A/B testing in the wild.
The interesting processes are the following:
main thread (measure you own JS impact)
compositor thread
capture device + thread
webrtc thread (maybe the same as capture thread)
Additionally, if the use is decoding using WebCodec on a thread, we might need combined measurements for hardware decoder and thread
It would be very helpful to know current browser process (tab) contribution into the total CPU load.
For example, I have a powerful machine, I am in the video conference, and also I run chromium build. CPU becomes 100% busy, but it does not make sense to reduce number of video feeds in the conference, as this will not save any visible CPU amount - most CPU is taken by build process.
In the video conference code I would analyze current process contribution, and if it is less than lets say 50%, I would avoid any CPU saving activities.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: