Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for MFA #6

Open
flippyboy opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Add support for MFA #6

flippyboy opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@flippyboy
Copy link

When trying to log in using an MFA enabled account, I get the following reply:
Logging in... &{%!e(string=could not find node that matches "input[name=\"SAMLResponse\"]")}

I'm guessing this is because I have MFA enabled on my account.
As MFA is something that everyone should have enabled on their accounts, it would be nice to support it here.

@Knappek
Copy link
Contributor

Knappek commented Feb 2, 2023

Thanks for filing this feature request @flippyboy. I was able to reproduce this issue, it's indeed happening on MFA enabled accounts. I will try to find some time the enxt days to work on that.

@laidbackware
Copy link
Contributor

In an ideal world a user would be able to request an API via customer connect, in the same way that they can on network.pivotal.io. This would negate the need for any username or password to be used by vcc. That said I think we'd have to demonstrate signifficant use of vcc to justify the customer connect team doing this work.

@flippyboy
Copy link
Author

I just found out that Customer Connect has the possibility to use an authentication code instead of username + password.
https://kb.vmware.com/s/article/2056457
If it is possible to use that in this tool, that would be a nice way of solving the MFA problem

@laidbackware
Copy link
Contributor

Very interesting, thanks @flippyboy. I'll add this to the backlog, as would hopefully simplify things quite a bit on our side.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants