Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add falling back to wasm swc build on native load failure #36612

Merged
merged 8 commits into from May 2, 2022

Conversation

ijjk
Copy link
Member

@ijjk ijjk commented May 2, 2022

Follow-up to #36527 this adds falling back to the wasm swc build when loading the native bindings fails so that we don't block the build on the native dependency being available.

This continues off of #33496 but does not add a postinstall script yet and only downloads the fallback when the native dependency fails to load.

@ijjk ijjk added created-by: Next.js team PRs by the Next.js team type: next labels May 2, 2022
@ijjk
Copy link
Member Author

ijjk commented May 2, 2022

Stats from current PR

Default Build (Decrease detected ✓)
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
buildDuration 15s 15.1s ⚠️ +62ms
buildDurationCached 6.1s 6.1s -31ms
nodeModulesSize 463 MB 463 MB ⚠️ +109 kB
Page Load Tests Overall decrease ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 3.497 3.539 ⚠️ +0.04
/ avg req/sec 714.95 706.42 ⚠️ -8.53
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 1.163 1.169 ⚠️ +0.01
/error-in-render avg req/sec 2149.92 2137.96 ⚠️ -11.96
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
925.HASH.js gzip 179 B 179 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 42 kB 42 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 28.6 kB 28.6 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.44 kB 1.44 kB
Overall change 72.3 kB 72.3 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 1.36 kB 1.36 kB
_error-HASH.js gzip 193 B 193 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 308 B 308 B
css-HASH.js gzip 327 B 327 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 3.08 kB 3.08 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 359 B 359 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 920 B 920 B
image-HASH.js gzip 5.71 kB 5.71 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 263 B 263 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.64 kB 2.64 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 320 B 320 B
script-HASH.js gzip 391 B 391 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 318 B 318 B
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip 107 B 107 B
Overall change 16.3 kB 16.3 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 459 B 459 B
Overall change 459 B 459 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
index.html gzip 531 B 531 B
link.html gzip 544 B 544 B
withRouter.html gzip 527 B 527 B
Overall change 1.6 kB 1.6 kB

Default Build with SWC
General Overall increase ⚠️
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
buildDuration 16.9s 17.2s ⚠️ +268ms
buildDurationCached 6s 6.1s ⚠️ +42ms
nodeModulesSize 463 MB 463 MB ⚠️ +109 kB
Page Load Tests Overall increase ✓
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
/ failed reqs 0 0
/ total time (seconds) 3.504 3.518 ⚠️ +0.01
/ avg req/sec 713.54 710.6 ⚠️ -2.94
/error-in-render failed reqs 0 0
/error-in-render total time (seconds) 1.146 1.142 0
/error-in-render avg req/sec 2182.06 2189.61 +7.55
Client Bundles (main, webpack)
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
925.HASH.js gzip 178 B 178 B
framework-HASH.js gzip 42.2 kB 42.2 kB
main-HASH.js gzip 29.1 kB 29.1 kB
webpack-HASH.js gzip 1.45 kB 1.45 kB
Overall change 73 kB 73 kB
Legacy Client Bundles (polyfills)
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
polyfills-HASH.js gzip 31 kB 31 kB
Overall change 31 kB 31 kB
Client Pages
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
_app-HASH.js gzip 1.35 kB 1.35 kB
_error-HASH.js gzip 179 B 179 B
amp-HASH.js gzip 312 B 312 B
css-HASH.js gzip 324 B 324 B
dynamic-HASH.js gzip 3.08 kB 3.08 kB
head-HASH.js gzip 357 B 357 B
hooks-HASH.js gzip 921 B 921 B
image-HASH.js gzip 5.76 kB 5.76 kB
index-HASH.js gzip 261 B 261 B
link-HASH.js gzip 2.76 kB 2.76 kB
routerDirect..HASH.js gzip 322 B 322 B
script-HASH.js gzip 392 B 392 B
withRouter-HASH.js gzip 317 B 317 B
85e02e95b279..7e3.css gzip 107 B 107 B
Overall change 16.5 kB 16.5 kB
Client Build Manifests
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
_buildManifest.js gzip 458 B 458 B
Overall change 458 B 458 B
Rendered Page Sizes
vercel/next.js canary ijjk/next.js feat/swc-wasm-fallback Change
index.html gzip 529 B 529 B
link.html gzip 543 B 543 B
withRouter.html gzip 526 B 526 B
Overall change 1.6 kB 1.6 kB
Commit: 296573f

@ijjk ijjk marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2022 16:14

logLoadFailure(attempts, true)
})
return pendingBindings
}

function loadBindingsSync() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this fallback only work for async bindings calls?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Currently yes since it requires fetching the wasm package so we aren't able to fallback for the jest case unless we load the bindings eagerly similar to what @huozhi is describing below.

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 3692a5e into vercel:canary May 2, 2022
@ijjk ijjk deleted the feat/swc-wasm-fallback branch May 3, 2022 00:24
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2022
Follow-up to #36612 this updates to eagerly load the swc bindings unless babel is being used so that we don't wait for the transform calls to initialize swc. Eagerly loading in jest also allows us to fallback to the wasm bindings when previously we couldn't since they needed to wait for the import.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants