Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show the build/activity indicator while re-fetching data for GS(S)P being edited #16790

Closed
ijjk opened this issue Sep 2, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #16789
Closed

Show the build/activity indicator while re-fetching data for GS(S)P being edited #16790

ijjk opened this issue Sep 2, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #16789
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@ijjk
Copy link
Member

ijjk commented Sep 2, 2020

As a follow-up to #16744 we should also show the build/activity indicator while the data is being re-fetched so the user knows something is happening

@ijjk ijjk self-assigned this Sep 2, 2020
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot closed this as completed in #16789 Sep 3, 2020
@Timer Timer added this to the iteration 8 milestone Sep 3, 2020
kodiakhq bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2020
…16789)

This is a follow-up to #16744 which shows the build/activity indicator while the data is being re-fetched to let the user know the re-fetching is occurring 

Closes: #16790
HitoriSensei pushed a commit to HitoriSensei/next.js that referenced this issue Sep 26, 2020
…ercel#16789)

This is a follow-up to vercel#16744 which shows the build/activity indicator while the data is being re-fetched to let the user know the re-fetching is occurring 

Closes: vercel#16790
@balazsorban44
Copy link
Member

This issue has been automatically locked due to no recent activity. If you are running into a similar issue, please create a new issue with the steps to reproduce. Thank you.

@vercel vercel locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 29, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants