Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial support for JDK 11 #263

Merged
merged 9 commits into from Dec 4, 2018
Merged

Initial support for JDK 11 #263

merged 9 commits into from Dec 4, 2018

Conversation

msridhar
Copy link
Collaborator

@msridhar msridhar commented Dec 3, 2018

For now, only the :nullaway:test target is passing on CI. We need to address issues outlined in #259 to get everything working, and it may be a while before the sample Android app can easily be built. That said, I think this initial level of support is useful and worth landing.

@@ -294,6 +294,11 @@ public void externalInitexternalInitSupportFields() {

@Test
public void generatedAsUnannotated() {
String generatedAnnot =
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

javax.annotation.Generated has disappeared in JDK 11 🙁

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there an equivalent? What do people use instead?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is javax.annotation.processing.Generated now, though there is no consensus on what to use (see e.g. grpc/grpc-java#3633 for discussion). Here we just use javax.annotation.processing.Generated in our tests if we're on JDK 11

@msridhar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

msridhar commented Dec 3, 2018

@lazaroclapp I don't fully understand the coveralls integration. Any chance you can confirm that it is still configured correctly? Now we will be running two different Travis jobs (and likely will do so for a while) so not sure about what the config should be.

Copy link
Collaborator

@lazaroclapp lazaroclapp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Honestly, I am not sure about the coveralls status. I am not even sure it was well configured to begin with. I can take a look at that later, but, for now, this looks good to land to me :)

@msridhar msridhar merged commit f1a8751 into master Dec 4, 2018
@kageiit kageiit deleted the ms/jdk-11 branch December 4, 2018 03:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants