Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] exclude external type declaration merging #3959

Merged

Conversation

idan-at
Copy link
Contributor

@idan-at idan-at commented Oct 4, 2021

Lately (not sure exactly which version), this snippet started failing no the no-shadow rule:

import type { Foo } from 'bar';
declare module 'bar' {
  export interface Foo {
    x: string;
  }

It shouldn't fail, since this is the way to extend external types in typescript (there's no re-declaration here)

This PR fixes it.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @idan-at!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint. As a thank you, your profile/company logo will be added to our main README which receives thousands of unique visitors per day.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #3959 (a57c4a0) into master (7842090) will increase coverage by 0.26%.
The diff coverage is 90.00%.

❗ Current head a57c4a0 differs from pull request most recent head b85322f. Consider uploading reports for the commit b85322f to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3959      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.12%   93.39%   +0.26%     
==========================================
  Files         277      151     -126     
  Lines        9781     8103    -1678     
  Branches     2851     2572     -279     
==========================================
- Hits         9109     7568    -1541     
+ Misses        244      181      -63     
+ Partials      428      354      -74     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 93.39% <90.00%> (+0.26%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-shadow.ts 76.51% <90.00%> (+1.10%) ⬆️
packages/scope-manager/src/referencer/Reference.ts
packages/scope-manager/src/lib/es2019.string.ts
.../scope-manager/src/variable/ImplicitLibVariable.ts
packages/scope-manager/src/scope/CatchScope.ts
packages/scope-manager/src/lib/esnext.intl.ts
packages/scope-manager/src/lib/es2021.ts
...ckages/scope-manager/src/referencer/VisitorBase.ts
...e-manager/src/scope/FunctionExpressionNameScope.ts
packages/scope-manager/src/lib/esnext.symbol.ts
... and 117 more

@bradzacher bradzacher added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 4, 2021
@bradzacher bradzacher changed the title fix(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] exclude external type declaration mer… feat(eslint-plugin): [no-shadow] exclude external type declaration merging Oct 4, 2021
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thanks! Just requesting changes on the dead-ish code: either getting rid of it or adding a test case to exercise it.

packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-shadow.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-shadow.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-shadow.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Oct 16, 2021
@idan-at idan-at dismissed a stale review via 2b00d98 October 17, 2021 11:34
@bradzacher bradzacher removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Oct 18, 2021
Copy link
Member

@bradzacher bradzacher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

perfect - thanks for thsi!

nice work making it so strict - this is amazing!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants