You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While hopefully TS+ will be adopted by a good number of libraries (unlikely especially at the early stage) we can't assume 100% adoption, we need some form of external definitions that could be independently wrote for packages, something of the sort of DTS.
Ideas:
an org @tsplus-types to hold definitions
a json based definition
Ideally, if such json spec exists we could also "compile to json spec" instead of polluting the .d.ts with jsdoc comments
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While hopefully TS+ will be adopted by a good number of libraries (unlikely especially at the early stage) we can't assume 100% adoption, we need some form of external definitions that could be independently wrote for packages, something of the sort of DTS.
Ideas:
@tsplus-types
to hold definitionsIdeally, if such json spec exists we could also "compile to json spec" instead of polluting the
.d.ts
with jsdoc commentsThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: