Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider OxiPng instead of OptiPNG #167

Closed
kaspergrubbe opened this issue Nov 26, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Consider OxiPng instead of OptiPNG #167

kaspergrubbe opened this issue Nov 26, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@kaspergrubbe
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @toy, I am not sure if you have seen it, but

OxiPng is a rewrite of OptiPNG that supports multithreading and written in a safer language (rust) https://crates.rs/crates/oxipng

I do not know if they are 1-to-1 compatible, but maybe it would be worth looking into, their benchmarks looks promising.

@toy
Copy link
Owner

toy commented Nov 28, 2018

Thanks for opening the issue. It looks interesting, as optimisation of png images is extremely slow and whatever can help it is good.

oblakeerickson added a commit to oblakeerickson/image_optim that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2021
Based on toy#167

Oxipng is a multi-threaded rust implementation of Optipng.

https://github.com/shssoichiro/oxipng
oblakeerickson added a commit to oblakeerickson/image_optim that referenced this issue Jun 7, 2021
Based on toy#167

Oxipng is a multi-threaded rust implementation of Optipng.

https://github.com/shssoichiro/oxipng
toy pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2021
Based on #167

Oxipng is a multi-threaded rust implementation of Optipng.

https://github.com/shssoichiro/oxipng
toy pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 15, 2021
Based on #167

Oxipng is a multi-threaded rust implementation of Optipng.

https://github.com/shssoichiro/oxipng
toy pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 16, 2021
Based on #167

Oxipng is a multi-threaded rust implementation of Optipng.

https://github.com/shssoichiro/oxipng
@toy
Copy link
Owner

toy commented Oct 19, 2021

This should have been closed with #190

@toy toy closed this as completed Oct 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants