Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Signal Challenge Series #792

Open
svenson95 opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

Signal Challenge Series #792

svenson95 opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@svenson95
Copy link
Contributor

svenson95 commented Apr 18, 2024

I think it's a good idea to discuss about new challenges in the first place. So I've created this "issue" here to talk about it. Hope that's fine.

Since we talked about signal challenges in my last challenge proposal, I've thought about a cool challenge user story. It might be a 3/4 parts series about signals, including the new input, output, viewChild syntax among other things. My idea would be to create a new section in the challenges (like angular, forms, performance, testing, ...) for signals. That could be a eyecatcher for devs who want to learn more about signals.

Here is our discussion from my last challenge proposal, if you want to look at it again. Feel free to give some feedback to the draft below.


Example:

  • Online-Shop application, buying a laptop.

Challenge 1: Signal Effect Bug | bug-effect-signal

  • Context: Effect to open alert doesn't work as expected.
  • User Story:
    • Task 1: fix wrong implementation.
    • Bonus Task: refactor implementation with computed signal.

Challenge 2: Signal Basics

  • Context: Bob 🧙‍♂️ want's to update the project to the newest version of angular, and take advantage of the new signal feature.
  • User Story:
    • Task 1: refactor a Observable to signal
    • Task 2: refactor @ViewChildren() with viewChild() (With a suitable example that highlights the advantages)

Challenge 3: Computed function with a ternary inside

  • Context: You're working an application which has a light and dark theme. Bob 🧙‍♂️ want's a cleaner way to detect if dark mode is active.
  • User Story: refactor a function isDarkModeActive with a computed signal (computed function with a ternary inside)

Challenge 4: ...

@jdegand
Copy link
Contributor

jdegand commented Apr 19, 2024

Check out e-oz's medium for a few great signal articles and more ideas.

I like the idea of exploring of some patterns not translating to signals. Like if you use an outside flag that's not a signal and combine in a ternary with 2 signals. The outside flag doesn't update so the conditional will only be evaluated the first time. Something like this might not warrant a separate challenge, but can be included in the starter code. Maybe, have a loading flag and conditionally render something different in the navbar.

Bob dove right into converting the app to using signals, but of course, it wasn't so easy and you need to help fix this....

Surprisingly, I think a good topic is bindings with signals, as this will be important for zoneless. [value]=”value” lacks reactivity.

You can have a challenge where you swap computed for effect (or vice versa) and challenger has to swap from one to the other. I think effect has issues whereby it tracks too many things and this can cause performance issues.

Leaking the reactive context and fixing it with untracked is a must challenge. These scenarios cause leaks: creating an instance of a class that reads some signals, calling a function that calls another function, which reads a signal;
and emitting a new value to an observable.

Since the testing series uses Angular Testing Library, you don't really have to explore difficulty in testing signals.

@tomalaforge
Copy link
Owner

Yes we need to think about signal challenges. This is indeed a good idea to help people embrace this new reactivity pattern

creating a challenge around untrack is a good idea, but untrack is not used very often

There is many things around effect also. I was thinking of an observable called inside an effect which is never cleanup. It's a bit messy but I'm sure we can find some in all databases 😅

I haven't got a lot of time recently and I'm still very busy the next two months but then I will start to do new challenges again. v18 will be released soon and some challenges around zoneless is also a good idea.

@svenson95 svenson95 changed the title Signal Challenge Series? Signal Challenge Series May 6, 2024
@jdegand
Copy link
Contributor

jdegand commented May 12, 2024

Maybe, it is best to have a dedicated issue for all challenge ideas. You could make a single comment for each idea.

Here's an article about new Angular 18 features.

@svenson95
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe, it is best to have a dedicated issue for all challenge ideas. You could make a single comment for each idea.

Here's an article about new Angular 18 features.

Yeah i started this issue to think about the challenges. We could use the same example for these challenge series, this would be cool imo.

@jdegand
Copy link
Contributor

jdegand commented May 24, 2024

I thought this short video from Josh Morony could be a challenge. When a toSignal signal has an error and if the signal is read multiple times, there can be multiple alerts or errors thrown. rejectErrors would have been the simple answer and using catchError in a different part of the stream would have been an alternative solution.

The two step process of converting to an observable with from and converting to a signal with toSignal may be required for the behavior.

I tried to recreate it and I wasn't able to get multiple errors. Ionic was used and I think that may have contributed to the behavior. So I have abandoned the idea. This seems like it would be a very infrequent bug anyway since toSignal behaves like async pipe and swallows errors.

@tomalaforge
Copy link
Owner

Nice idea, I will try to reproduce it.

@jdegand
Copy link
Contributor

jdegand commented May 29, 2024

This Deborah Kurata video seems like it would make for a difficult challenge.

Essentially, you can use computed to wrap a read-only signal with a new signal to make the read-only signal a writable signal. Then you have to use ()() to read that signal.

She uses the case of returning a list from API and how you can't easily add a new item to said list without another request.

It probably would be best to not repeat the same scenario and maybe someone can think of another scenario for such a technique.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants