Add afl fuzz tests #272
Merged
Add afl fuzz tests #272
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
By the way, I ran 4 fuzzer instances on master for 5.5 hours and they didn't find any crashes. |
|
Still interested in this? |
|
Sorry for the delay on this. @dbrgn I'd love to understand the benefits of afl over the current fuzzing approach? If it makes sense to add then I think we should! |
|
@LucioFranco AFL and libfuzzer use slightly different approaches, so in my view more fuzzing is always helpful 馃檪 |
LucioFranco
approved these changes
Jul 6, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here's a setup for fuzzing prost with afl.
For details, see
FUZZING.md.I ran it against prost 0.6.0 to verify that it works, the stack overflow from #267 was found within about 15 minutes 馃檪
Fixes #270.