Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Italics don't have +lnum #21

Open
alerque opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Italics don't have +lnum #21

alerque opened this issue Aug 27, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@alerque
Copy link
Member

alerque commented Aug 27, 2020

As can be seen in samples from #20, the Italic style doesn't seem to have +lnum.

@thlinard
Copy link

More generally, the features and classes aren't synchronized between Roman and Italic.

For example, Italic has a case feature (which could be extended, since there are 3 .case glyphs) that Roman doesn't have. The Roman has a lnum class with all the .lf glyphs: by duplicating it, the dnom_frac_numr_ordn_sinf_subs_sups class of the Italic could be renamed to dnom_frac_lnum_numr_ordn_sinf_subs_sups, and the lnum feature of the Roman could be imported directly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants