Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: removed duplicate assertion #274

Merged

Conversation

brrianalexis
Copy link
Member

Removed a duplicate assertion on the tests for toHaveClass.

Checklist:

  • [N/A] Documentation
  • Tests
  • [N/A] Updated Type Definitions
  • Ready to be merged

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #274 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #274   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           23        23           
  Lines          320       320           
  Branches        71        71           
=========================================
  Hits           320       320           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7ea936d...c591fbe. Read the comment docs.

@gnapse gnapse merged commit f36fe54 into testing-library:master Jul 12, 2020
@gnapse
Copy link
Member

gnapse commented Jul 12, 2020

@all-contributors add @brrianalexis for tests

@allcontributors
Copy link
Contributor

@gnapse

I've put up a pull request to add @brrianalexis! 🎉

@gnapse
Copy link
Member

gnapse commented Jul 15, 2020

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.11.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@brrianalexis brrianalexis deleted the to-have-class-duplicate-assertion branch July 27, 2020 18:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants