GitHub Workflows security hardening #1193
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Alex <aleksandrosansan@gmail.com>
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 7389dab:
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1193 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 24 24
Lines 998 998
Branches 326 327 +1
=========================================
Hits 998 998
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
|
Let's see if it works. |
eps1lon
approved these changes
Dec 23, 2022
|
This was missing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What:
This PR adds explicit permissions section to workflows.
Why:
This is a security best practice because by default workflows run with extended set of permissions (except from
on: pull_requestfrom external forks). By specifying any permission explicitly all others are set to none. By using the principle of least privilege the damage a compromised workflow can do (because of an injection or compromised third party tool or action) is restricted.How:
It is recommended to have most strict permissions on the top level and grant write permissions on job level case by case.
Checklist:
docs site N/A