Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unusual public in Groovy example code #2238

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 11, 2020
Merged

Remove unusual public in Groovy example code #2238

merged 2 commits into from Apr 11, 2020

Conversation

mkutz
Copy link
Contributor

@mkutz mkutz commented Jan 12, 2020

The public access modifier is quite unusal in Groovy code.
Groovy treats fields without access modifier as properties and so public is kind of the default.

The `public` access modifier is quite unusal in Groovy code.
Groovy treats fields without access modifier as properties and so public is kind of the default.
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Apr 11, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you believe this is a mistake, please reply to this comment to keep it open. If there isn't one already, a PR to fix or at least reproduce the problem in a test case will always help us get back on track to tackle this.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Apr 11, 2020
@kiview
Copy link
Member

kiview commented Apr 11, 2020

This is completely true, I missed this PR 😅

@stale stale bot removed the stale label Apr 11, 2020
@kiview kiview added modules/spock Spock Extension type/docs labels Apr 11, 2020
@kiview kiview merged commit f5948a9 into testcontainers:master Apr 11, 2020
@kiview kiview added this to the next milestone Apr 11, 2020
quincy pushed a commit to quincy/testcontainers-java that referenced this pull request May 28, 2020
…ners#2238)

The `public` access modifier is quite unidiomatic in Groovy code.

Co-authored-by: Kevin Wittek <kiview@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants