Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Go version in the build container. #195

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 8, 2021

Conversation

creachadair
Copy link
Contributor

A prerequisite for #194, which needs an updated Go toolchain version.

@creachadair creachadair merged commit 8882f27 into master Nov 8, 2021
@creachadair creachadair deleted the mjf/fix-build-container branch November 8, 2021 16:05
creachadair added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
creachadair pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
In #195 I updated the Go version, and also swapped from Debian to Alpine for
the base image. This was OK for the build, but it turns out we also use the
same image to run golangci-lint. That action uses a binary for a different
architecture, which fails on this image.

So:
- Keep the Go version, but revert the base image.
- Split image layers to make rebuilds faster.
- Add version labels as arguments.
- Add some documentation to the workflow configs.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants