Require name scope

[piranna]

Add new rule to require name to have defined a scope. Ideally It should be a three state field (always, never or don't café).

[piranna]

Maybe valid-name-scope would do the job with a regexp, in that case an example is needed un the docs.

[tclindner]

Thank you, @piranna! I take a look at this tomorrow and get back to you.

[piranna]

Thank you! :-)

[tclindner]

@piranna do you think valid-values-name-scope will meet your needs? error covers always. off covers don't care. never is a gap.

btw - I've got time this weekend to get caught up on some tickets 🤓

[piranna]

@piranna do you think valid-values-name-scope will meet your needs? error covers always. off covers don't care. never is a gap.

Didn't test it, but as I've told you in #200 (comment), reviewing the code maybe it could work by defining a regular expression instead of a full scope, just only it would need to be tested :-)

By the way, why dows it requires the @ to be defined in the name scope? Is it for generity in case there's another registry don't use that pattern for scopes?

[tclindner]

@piranna - yes, re: @. Do you have any concerns with that approach?

I'm going to focus on adding plugin support next. Do you have an immediate use case for never right now? If so, I can focus on this first.

[piranna]

@piranna - yes, re: @. Do you have any concerns with that approach?

Not at all, just only would be nice to have that in the documentation :-)

Do you have an immediate use case for never right now?

Not at all :-)